3 Solutions to Optimizing DERs for Frequency Regulation in Microgrids

Posted by Samantha Bruce on May 3, 2018 3:09:55 PM

Frequency regulation is currently provided by large individual resources, such as coal plants and gas turbines. There are growing interests of utilizing power flexibility of DERs in microgrids for providing frequency regulation. Researchers from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) funded by ARPA-E, have developed a control framework for a microgrid that coordinates DERs for frequency regulation.

 

 


 

 

Three Stages of a Frequency Regulation Market

 

 

Stage 1

 

Offline market clearance: RTO/ISO requires each resource (or aggregated DERs in a microgrid) to provide various bids

  

Offline market clearance: RTO/ISO requires each resource (or aggregated DERs in a microgrid) to provide various bids

 

  

Stage 2

 

Regulation signal dispatch: A RTO/ISO dispatches the target active power to the resources (e.g., aggregators for microgrids, coal plants and gas turbines) based on the allocated capacities and mileages

 

 

Stage 3

 

Real-time tracking: Each resource tracks the procured active power

 

 

 

 

 

The figure below illustrates the hierarchical structure for frequency regulation. RTO/ISO assigns a target active power to the aggregators. Each aggregator is responsible to track a part of the target active power by coordinating the DERs under its control. The total active power of the aggregators matches the target value.

v2-2

 

 

 

Challenges for incorporating DERs in frequency regulation

 

Challenge 1

 

An aggregator needs to identify the total capacity of DERs for the purpose of bidding in the market clearance stage. Even if the capacities, cost functions and ramp rates for all the DERs are known, it is not clear how these would combine together for the whole microgrid due to the presence of power flow constraints.

 

For example:

3 DERs with capacities being respectively 5,4, and 2, and power flow limits labelled next to the corresponding lines. The power flow limits make the actual capacity being 10 (5+2+3) instead of the direct sum of the capacity 11 (5+2+4). A similar argument holds for the ramp rate.

 

 

v3

Challenge 2

 

The price of producing the said amount of regulation depends upon how the regulation signal is disaggregated amongst the DERs. If there is no specific way of doing it, the cost for the same total regulation could be different depending upon the cost functions of the DERs. Also, due to the uncertainties associated with DERs, it is desirable to allocate the regulation signal to the aggregators in a distributed way.

 

  

Challenge 3

 

Allocation of the regulation signal to the resources may not be feasible in concurrent regulation signal dispatch method (due to redistribution process caused by ramp rate constraints).

 

 

 

Solutions for optimizing DERs in frequency regulation

 

 Solutions for challenge 1

 

 Solving an optimization problem which takes DERs’ cost functions, capacities, and ramp rates into account. The optimization also incorporates the power flow constraints to ensure the feasibility of the solution.

 

V4_2


 Solutions for challenge 2

 

 Designing a distributed algorithm to optimally allocate the regulation signal to all the aggregators for each regulation set-point.



 

Solutions for challenge 3

 

Formulating the optimal allocation problem as a constrained optimization which reformulates itself to minimize the difference between the procured collective regulation and required one.

 


Request Free Microgrid DER Modeling Demo

 

 

 

More details are available in the paper “Participation of Microgrids in Frequency Regulation Market” by P. Srivastava, C.-Y. Chang and J. Cortés, to appear in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 2018.

Topics: Microgrids, C-HIL, DER, Energy, ARPA-E

Subscribe to Email Updates

Recent Posts